Friday, February 5, 2010

MY DEER IN THE HEADLIGHTS

Driving home from work in the dark the other night, I noticed a glimmer of movement ahead. I quickly pulled the stalk for my high beams, and right in front of my car were two large eyes staring back at me. Yikes, a deer…then two, then three. As I shifted my manual transmission to neutral and braked hard to a complete stop, I flashed my high beams to oncoming traffic to warn them. As the three deer casually crossed the road, several thoughts raced through my mind. First, I thought how lucky I was that I hadn’t smashed my car into one of the deer, for their sake as well as mine. Secondly, I thought of how instantaneous my response was as I multitasked through the process. Steering, clutch, brake, gear shift and high beam stalk; all simultaneously involved, all operated by intuitive reaction. It was pitch black, but I was able to reach each component effectively, successfully completing the task at hand. Everything in my Scion TC was placed logically, right where it needed to be, allowing me to escape unscathed.

Coincidentally, moments before this close encounter of the venison kind, I had been thinking about high beams. Driving home, I was constantly raising and lowering my headlights. My drive includes long stretches of dark country roads that require high beams, but the traffic is heavy during rush hour which requires low beams. As I drove, my hand repeatedly left the steering wheel to raise and lower the beams. It was annoying, not to mention potentially dangerous, as my left hand repeatedly left the steering wheel. I then remembered the ease and convenience of the old floor mounted high beam switches. A driver could just leave his/her foot on the switch, then raise or lower the beams as needed without the driver’s hand ever leaving the steering wheel. It was safe and convenient.

This raises the question: why is it that the floor mounted high beam switch has been eliminated in virtually all vehicles? Is it because the switches corroded and failed due to moisture from wet, slushy boots? Is it because it took too long for a driver to find the switch on the floor, making it a safety issue? Or is it simply a cost saving measure for manufacturers i.e. is it cheaper to install one complete switch assembly on the steering column, rather than running a separate line from the floor to wherever?

My research has yet to come up with a clear answer as to when and why the floor mounted high beam switch disappeared. But following my close call the other night with my three deer, I was thankful for the stalk mounted high beam switch. There’s no way that I could have operated my clutch and brake, as well as warn the oncoming traffic with a “flash”, if the switch was on the floor. I guess that I just answered my own question, the stalk is safer, at least for a manual transmission.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

TOYOTA RECALLS

While at this writing, it seems that my new RAV4 and old Scion TC may not be victims of recalls, Toyota's saga is still unfolding with a new chapter breaking every day. From floor mats, to gas pedals, to brakes, if you own a Toyota, it's important to keep up on the latest. Follow these helpful links for more information:

http://www.toyota.com/recall/

http://www.autoblog.com/toyota_recall/guide

http://www.edmunds.com/industry-car-news/toyota-recall.html

http://www.autonews.com/

VIDEO OF INSTALLATION OF ACCELERATOR SHIM:
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/04/fixing-toyotas-recalled-pedals-the-video-starring-doug-the-mas/#continued

We will see what tomorrow (and Toyota) brings.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

WINTER DRIVING, AND LIVE TO TELL ABOUT IT

Our recent series of winter storms proved the obvious once again: snow and ice makes for tricky driving. On my short drive home during the storm the other night, I saw a tractor trailer jack knifed into a snow bank, a car down an embankment and another car stuck in a snow drift. These drivers proved that snow and ice are slippery, and driving on them requires special driving techniques. Obviously! If it’s so obvious, then why do drivers feel the need to test these physical limits regularly, much to the delight of tow trucks and body shops throughout the area? Winter driving is not impossible. It just requires some discipline and a little common sense.

The first rule: SLOW DOWN! Obvious, but how many tractor trailers or SUVs have whizzed by you on the Turnpike, only to end up off the road a few miles later? Think about it, tires are rubber and so are hockey pucks. The difference between your car navigating safely and sliding across a winter road like a puck is the traction gained from the tread of the tire. The slower the vehicle travels, the more chance the tire has to disperse snow or moisture out of its tread, and grab for more. If the tread does not clear whatever form of moisture, it’s just rubber floating on the surface. Your tire is now a hockey puck with no traction. Slow down and let the tread work for you.

As you start out on a winter’s day, begin slowly to get a feel of the road conditions; to learn what the appropriate, safe speed may be. Winter driving experts advise drivers to double their distance to other cars, as compared to dry conditions; that’s two car lengths for each 10 mph. Also, keep alert, looking ahead for changes in road surfaces and conditions. Always look for an out in case of a collision or a slide. If you do need to stop quickly, remember not to pump your ABS brakes. Allow them to work as designed by applying steady, firm pressure. While ABS brakes and stability control are handy inventions, they don’t replace common sense when things get slick. Slow down and stay alert.

When driving in the winter, beware of the false confidence of 4 wheel drive. 4x4 can help you get out of a jam, but it can also put you in one. 4 wheel drive only helps if a drive wheel is slipping, like if you are stuck in a drift. Once your vehicle is underway, traction is a factor of tires, not how the wheels are being driven. A state trooper was interviewed during our last storm, and he said that nearly all of the rescues for that storm were a result of SUVs going too fast. His comment, the braking ability and stopping distance of vehicles are the same, regardless of rear wheel drive, front wheel dive or 4x4. Need proof? A friend’s 4x4 SUV slid through a red light during that storm because the tires were on ice. 4x4 did nothing to help him. The fact that he was driving slowly is what saved him.

Final bit of advice: prepare your car properly for driving. Clean the snow and ice off of the entire vehicle, not just a peep hole through the windshield. You don’t need a chunk of snow sliding from your roof to your windshield, obscuring your vision as you brake to a stop. Meanwhile, the car behind you doesn’t need a huge boulder of snow flying off your car and into his. Defrost your windshield and windows fully before your drive, to ensure that you can see around all 360 degrees of the vehicle. It’s hard enough to see when driving in rain, sleet and/or snow; you don’t need to add to the danger by peering through a peephole.

As proud Mainers, we know that snow is a fact of life. With a little common sense and discipline, drivers can stay safe all winter long.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

AUTO HISTORY: Gone, but Not Forgotten

I was reading entries on autoblog.com the other day, a resource I check regularly to keep up on everything auto, and I came across a posting that I found odd. In fact, I initially found it to be somewhat disturbing. According to the post, Ford’s launch of its much anticipated Fiesta this summer will include “tap for three blinks” turn signals. Other Ford models will soon follow. Apparently, this is common on European vehicles, and has been available domestically on some VW, Audi, Chrysler, and recently, GM models. It took me several readings, to first understand what it was, and then why it would be necessary.

The argument is that there are too many drivers that turn on their turn signals and leave them on, making for dangerous driving. We have all come up behind a driver with their blinker left on, wondering if it was safe to pass, or would they pull out in front of you. In my experience, the inattentive flasher is only an occasional annoyance. Regardless, “tap for three blinks” allows the driver to engage the turn signal, the blinker flashes three times and turns off automatically. The argument is that it frees the driver to concentrate on the road, and ensures that turn signals are properly extinguished. Maybe so, but I view it as yet another intrusion on the fun of driving.

I really enjoy driving. I enjoy the physical process of operating the vehicle. Whether it’s driving a challenging mountain road, or cruising the open highway, I enjoy the feel of the road as I operate the car’s various components. It’s fun! When it comes to turn signals, I enjoy the decision making process of evaluating the traffic; turning on, then off my turn signals. I don’t need “tap for three blinks”. In fact, I prefer not to have the fun taken away. But, like so many other changes, “three blinks” will become standard, and the price of a new car will increase to pay for it. Naturally, a few years from now I will look back on this and say, “What was I thinking? How did I live with out it?”

With “tap for three blinks” on the horizon, it got me to thinking about some of the other changes to cars and driving over the years. Here is my nostalgic list of the “Gone, but Not Forgotten”:

Manual door locks
Crank windows
Floor mounted high beam switches
Standard transmissions
Full sized spares
Bench seats
Cigarette lighters
Carburetors (and their shortcomings)
The ability to service your own car
Tube tires
Rust
Clear visibility (especially backing a vehicle)
Radios: AM, to AM/FM, to 8 track, to cassette, to CD, to iPod/Mp3, to USB drive
Free air for your tires
Full service fill-up

Feel free to add to my list, just don’t take the fun out of driving.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

TIRE SAFETY: Don’t Drive Bare

Now that we have survived our first genuine snowstorm of the season, everyone has driven their own road test of sorts. The first storm always exposes imperfections and shortcomings in our vehicles, that once addressed, take us safely through to spring. Our recent storm’s blend of ice, snow and rain tested everyone’s resolve, as well as the condition of their transportation. While it wasn’t particularly cold, a friend of mine’s car already had to be jump started. His winter will start with a new battery. Another friend learned that he needed to add new wipers to his truck, after he could barely see his way home. My purchase for this winter season was new tires.

Tires are often neglected and taken for granted, but nothing is more critical to the safety and performance of any, and all, vehicles. Environmentalists are constantly stressing the importance of proper tire inflation, in order to optimize fuel economy. Ford lost millions in the Explorer rollover debacle. The blame was finally placed on over zealous drivers, combined with improperly inflated tires. As a result, new vehicles now have tire inflation monitoring systems. Owners can brag all they want about their 4 wheel or all-wheel drive, but without tires that are up to the job, the rest is just macho posturing.

In the case of my 2005 Scion TC, I was driving close to the edge. My 5 year old car had 45,000 miles on its 17”, Bridgestone Potenza, Z rated, performance tires. I could tell even last winter that they were feeling their age. There were several storms that, even though I was driving slowly, I could feel the tires float on top of the slush and snow. I had little traction, and it felt dangerous. Performance tires are not made for a Maine winter anyway. They are too wide to bite through the snow, and the rubber is too brittle in the cold winter temperatures to adhere to cold surfaces. My 215/45ZR17 Potenzas were made to grip around a corner during a hot summer day, not to climb the hills and valleys of the Portland Peninsula during a Northeaster.

Summer came and my aging tires continued onward. An occasional rain storm was not a problem. If there was a hint of hydroplaning, just slow down, right? After all, the wear bars were not showing. My attitude changed though, recently. Driving along innocently, I took a corner at regular speed, on dry pavement, and I could feel the Scion lose traction. If I was having trouble navigating a simple turn now, I was going to be in for a long, dangerous winter. So it was time to bite the bullet, and spend some money.

The search for THE right tire for my vehicle could have been a pain staking, time consuming process, or as simple as picking up the phone and buying whatever the local tire shop might have available. I chose somewhere in between the two. First step? I decided that I did not want to hassle with changing in and out of snow tires each time the seasons changed, so I compromised by deciding on all season radials. I wanted a name brand that would deliver reliability and safety, but I did not want to bankrupt myself in the process.

Research and shopping for tires is actually easy, thanks to the Internet. Through various Web sites, all you have to do is enter your vehicle and model, your preferred criteria and price range, then a variety of recommendations are magically laid before you. I did my initial research across every site that I could imagine, including tirerack.com, Sears and Sam’s Club, just to name a few. There are many more available. Regardless of which you surf, most sites are comprehensive, and will steer you in the right direction, based on driving style, usage, and most importantly, price. An added benefit with some, are the user reviews; comments and criticisms from those that are already driving your potential tire of choice.

In my case, there seemed to be hundreds of choices. I had to do something to narrow the field. Since I was impressed with the look and feel of the BF Goodrich tires that we had on our Windstar van, I thought that I would look at their choices. I know, that’s comparing apples to oranges, but I did not want to return to the factory Bridgestone Potenzas, and I didn’t want to pay the top price for Michelins. Research came up with the highly recommended BFGoodrich G-Force™ Super Sport All Season radials. At $125 each, they were right in my price ceiling of $500, and the owner reviews were favorable.

The purchase was made. For nearly $600 (tax and mounting), I now have four new tires, free roadside assistance, along with lifetime tire rotation and balancing. Man, what a difference! These tires are fearless. I can feel them aggressively grab every type of road surface, under any driving condition. Dry or wet, they confidently handle anything Mother Nature has to offer. While they are not snow tires, they do provide a genuine feeling of confidence when the snow flies. No longer am I tip-toeing to the next stop sign. I can now drive with the, “Power of the G-Force” under me.

So, while wear bars are a guide to tire wear, and the Maine State Inspection is the final gatekeeper for tire safety, don’t wait too long. I was almost guilty of driving bare this winter. While it cost me money for four new tires, the cost of an accident would certainly have been more. Like the saying goes, “The life you save may be you own.”

Monday, December 14, 2009

Holiday Safety



If you have any doubts of the impact of distracted driving or driving under the influence, the following video summary will change your mind.

Have a happy holiday. Drive safely!



VIDEO: Australian Transport Accident Commission celebrates 20 years of disturbing commercials — Autoblog

Thursday, November 19, 2009

DISTRACTED DRIVING: DON’T DO IT!!!

This blog was initially posted on May 6, 2008. Distracted driving continues in the news on a regular basis. With that in mind, I am reposting it for your review.

Susan Kimball visited the mother of this victim recently. Check out her report at:

http://www.wcsh6.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=111215&catid=2



“State Police say a young woman talking on her cell phone is the likely cause of last month's fatal crash on Interstate 295 in Cumberland.”


This was the opening line of the press release from the Maine State Police following their investigation into the cause of a horrific accident that occurred mid-morning on a beautiful, clear spring day here in Maine. This was the crash where a Toyota Corolla crossed the median on the interstate at a high rate of speed, driving into the opposing lane and striking a NEWS CENTER live truck. The driver of the car was killed, two of our coworkers were injured and both vehicles were totaled.

The details of the police investigation confirmed my suspicions from the moment the accident happened, an opinion that I shared with many coworkers and family members. The accident was not caused by a mechanical failure, another driver cutting her off, or the driver dodging wild turkeys, as some had speculated. It was caused by the driver using her cell phone while she was driving. She was a distracted driver.


The victim, Heather Bouchard, made the unfortunate decision to multitask while driving. The cell phone record confirms it. She was talking to a client on her phone. At the time of the crash, Ms. Bouchard was not wearing her seat belt, something her family said that she always wore. This, combined with other evidence, leads police to believe that Ms. Bouchard dropped her phone, released her seat belt to retrieve it and lost control of her vehicle, a decision that ultimately took her life.

We all have our own stories of observing, or even participating as distracted drivers. Basic acts of drinking coffee, tuning the radio, changing a CD, disciplining children, eating a sandwich, applying make-up, texting, and my favorite, knitting while driving. All simple tasks, all potentially deadly. A recent study conducted by the National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) found that, “…almost 80% of crashes involved some form of driver inattention within three seconds of the event.” The most common distraction was cell phone use. It only takes once. DON’T DO IT!


Many states now ban cell phone use while driving and require hands-free calling devices. In my opinion, this is still distracted driving and should not be encouraged. This opinion is shared by Ralph Nader’s Center for Auto Safety (CAS), to the point of recently filing a petition with the NHTSA asking the agency, “…to write rules prohibiting the use of interactive systems that allow drivers to have wireless access to e-mails and phone calls.” I agree! Anything that diverts a driver’s attention as he or she pilots a 2,000 pound machine driving 65 mph is potentially deadly. DON’T DO IT!

A landmark case occurred in Rochester, New York where a teenager was texting while driving. Phone records proved it. All five in the car were killed. The New York law was changed. Maybe Maine lawmakers need to consider a similar move. It seems so obvious. Distracted driving, no matter how brief, no matter how innocent, can kill. DON’T DO IT!