Wednesday, March 18, 2009

I Just Love a “Q-Ship”.

As noted in my last posting, my lifelong love affair with cars is rooted in my earliest childhood memories. In that installment I listed a few of the cars which lit the spark of car lust in my youthful heart. On that list there’s one vehicle, which is not like the others. The Ford Country Squire station wagon stands out in sharp contrast to sporty rides like the T-bird and the Jag. At first glance the Ford would seem a mundane choice indeed. Ah, but that’s where the fun starts. That family hauler was in fact my introduction to the notion of a four-wheeled Q-ship.
“Q-ship”? The term is a military reference. In Navy parlance circa WW II, a Q-ship was a retrofitted merchant ship, a freighter or other cargo carrier, which steamed innocently alongside dozens of other similar looking ships in a convoy carrying troops and supplies to war zones in Europe and Asia. To the unsuspecting eyes of Axis sub captains and other baddies of the high seas, the Q-ship looked like an easy target, just another unarmed transport ship. But, as they soon discovered, looks can be deceiving.
Lulled into a false sense of security, the enemy approached the seemingly defenseless convoy for a close-up direct attack. At that point the Q-ships navy crew would shift the false cloth and plywood bulkheads on deck revealing a massive array of firepower and with any luck blow the startled attackers out of the water. Mission accomplished!
The only hint that our Ford wagon was a Q-ship was a small sticker on the glove compartment door, which read “McCullough Supercharger”. That’s right. The wagon, which came from the factory equipped with a V8 and three-on-the-tree manual, had been modified by the addition of a fire breathing supercharger which boosted factory horsepower output by maybe 35-40%. As a result, this bland family hauler could really haul! I’m sure my dad enjoyed blowing the doors off unsuspecting hot rodders at the local “stop light Grand Prix”.
So a Q-ship car is one, which while outwardly appearing bland and uninteresting, is in fact bristling with a whole hidden arsenal of go-fast artillery. Car nut Jay Leno is very hip to the Q-ship idea and has several great examples in his massive collection. These include a rock-stock appearing first generation Olds Toronado coupe ( one of Bill Mitchell’s best designs ) with enough high tech wizardry hidden in the engine bay, drive train and chassis to embarrass the gold-chained Ferrari crowd up and down the P.C.H.
That’s a great car but, in my opinion, not his best Q-ship. That honor should be reserved for the grandma-blue, bland as butter, ’55 Buick sedan, which served as Leno’s home, office and daily transportation when he first arrived in L.A. all those years ago. Leno still has the car and it still looks like even grandma might get bored driving it. But, while outwardly it may look like Clark Kent on a bad hair day, on the serpentine blacktop of Mulholland drive it magically morph’s into Superman on steroids. Just take a look at those four old Buick hubcaps. No, look again, a little closer this time. What appear to be hubcaps are in fact custom built, light alloy billet wheels styled to perfectly mimic the original stock chrome wheel covers. The engine and running gear are highly modified, late model Corvette pieces which all add up to a 500 + hp Q-ship that would leave the “Little Old Lady from Pasadena” choking in its dust.
My dad had more than one of these beasts over the years and I’ll discuss them in more detail in future posts. I’ve also had a few myself. The original Taurus SHO was a fine example of the genre. I had a couple of these sleepers which in the early model years looked pretty much like a million other garden variety Tauri jamming the highways and byways. There was little evidence (mostly a few badges and model specific alloy wheels) to hint that this family sedan had the hot Yamaha sourced 24 valve V6, manual tranny and beefed up suspension and brakes. That was a great car which was more than capable of running with (and even ahead of) the latest German hi-buck sports sedans of the day.
My top Q-ship pick for the 2009 model year is an easy one. Everybody already has a heads up on the Mazda speed 3 hatchback and any one of the various boosted Subies on the road. But how about that nerdy looking, bottom feeder, four door Chevy Cobalt over there? Must be a low-end rental, eh? Um, well no, not really. As it happens that particular boring compact is in fact the SS model which means it’s hood conceals a breathed-on 4 banger eagerly pumping out 260 horses. The Brembos up front will easily haul you down to double digit speeds as you approach Houlton and with the right rubber the tricked out suspension is up to any back road task you can throw at it. I know money is tight but this one has all the right stuff for around $24K. I have to believe that the average Chevy salesperson these days is what the real estate ads refer to as a “highly motivated seller”. If you can remember to point out the four doors and decent gas mileage (and if you can manage to keep your foot out of it on the test drive) your wife may actually believe that you’ve grown up. Good luck! Let me know how you make out.

Tim Sample

Thursday, March 5, 2009

CARS ON THE RUN

Everyone enjoys a good movie: a chance to live vicariously through the adventure and romance of a leading character, to experience exotic locales, to be a super hero, or to drive a car in a way that only Hollywood can realize. What is more exciting than gripping the edge of your seat; widescreen visuals fueled by the thunderous sound of roaring engines and screeching tires, taking you on a thrill ride that you could never live on your own. It’s the thrill of the movie car chase. It’s living the thrill of cars.



There is a long history of car chase scenes in film, more than I realized until I started to really think about them. Everyone has their favorites, but at the top of my list, Bond leads the chase. The signature of any (and all) James Bond film(s) is the car chase. They all are exciting and they all take you where no man has gone before, or at least in reality. Since there are too many to critique, it’s better to just sit back, follow the link and enjoy the ride.

JAMES BOND
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=bond+car+chase&aq=1&oq=BOND+CAR




When it comes to movie car chases, the 1968 classic, BULLIT is a must see. Steve McQueen and stunt driver Bud Ekins traverse the hills of San Francisco high revving McQueen’s Mustang in hot pursuit of the Dodge Charger. From the moment you see the menacing grill of the Ford in the Dodge’s rear view mirror; you know what’s coming. The final tip off is the close-up of the seat belt being buckled by the driver of the Charger. Roll ‘em, and action! The rest is history. Topping speeds of over 100 mph, careening up, over and down the hills of San Francisco, the chase takes the viewer on the ultimate thrill ride.

So successful was this 9 minute scene, it overshadowed the rest of the film and it firmly established the Mustang as an icon of Americana. The Mustang’s excitement in this film has led Ford to successfully market limited edition “Bullit” versions of the car for sale to the general public. A dream becomes a reality, thanks to Hollywood.

BULLIT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMc2RdFuOxI


Making of Bullitt


Close on BULLIT’s heels came the ultimate car chase in 1971’s, THE FRENCH CONNECTION. Gene Hackman’s Pontiac zig-zagging through Brooklyn, chasing the elevated train, still thrills to this day. THE FRENCH CONNECTION's director, William Friedkin, successfully captured the essence of New York City traffic; turning fantasy into reality, as to how best to conquer the streets of Brooklyn, and how to live to tell the story. Wouldn’t it be great if you too could tackle rush hour the way he did?

THE FRENCH CONNECTION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu3GmRQ-U9k&feature=PlayList&p=078491C026D4FF96&playnext=1&index=35#




Roy Scheider (who played Gene Hackman’s partner in FC) returned to try to capitalize on the successful formula of the French Connection with a similar chase in the 1973 film, THE SEVEN UPS. While imitation is flattery, the scene does not quite measure up to the thrill of Friedkin’s work. An entertaining ride, but one you’ve taken many times before and since.

THE SEVEN UPS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vACWV5sRcY




A car chase has proven to be compelling enough to carry an entire film, as well as launch the career of the unknown director, Steven Spielberg. The 1971 made for TV thriller, DUEL, pitted Dennis Weaver against a faceless trucker for the entire film. One of the few chases of truck vs. car, and the car wins.

DUEL
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1003em-pDM8&feature=related


Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7TixHbC3rw




The George Lucas 1973 classic, AMERICAN GRAFFITI, captures the automobile as a signature of California dreamin’, along with the nostalgia of a bygone era, but as far as chase scenes? It only provides a short, disappointing street drag with an unknown actor (Harrison Ford) at the wheel.

AMERICAN GRAFFITI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFgTMYEaWlc




By 1977, car chase films progressed to the point of dominating the entire plot of a full length feature film in the form of Hal Needham’s, SMOKEY AND THE BANDIT. Needham, as a former Hollywood stuntman, turned a full length movie into one long chase scene, crash after crash. The formula worked. Many Smokey sequels and clones (CANNONBALL RUN) followed.

SMOKEY AND THE BANDIT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnRwQjTYfGI&feature=related




Many other films come to mind, some good, and some bad:

CORVETTE SUMMER, 1978
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U5NBCRdPFw&feature=related


THE BLUES BROS., 1980
http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi1636761881/

THE BLUES BROS. 2000, 1998
http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi1471873305/

THE FAST & FURIOUS, 2001
http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi2508980505/



The list of car chase films is endless. While my favorites are the Bond films, BULLIT and THE FRENCH CONNECTION, your list may start with the more contemporary FAST & FURIOUS, and grow from there. Regardless of the price of gas, or the state of the economy, car chases in film will continue. It will be fun to see what Hollywood delivers next. Get some popcorn, fasten your seat belt, and let’s ride.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

A Maine Car Guy is Born


If you’re reading this you can thank my wife and my brother-in-law Charlie for making it happen. For years they’ve been telling me, “You should have a ( fill in the blank ) “show”, “column” “blog” about cars.” A few years back my wife claimed that for my next birthday she was getting me a couple of rolls of those ubiquitous bright colored triangle flags which flutter across the “front line” at used car lots across America. It would have looked perfectly appropriate given the half dozen vehicles, which at any particular moment call our driveway “home”.
I can’t help it. It’s just the way I was raised. Some of my earliest and fondest memories of my childhood in the 1950’s are of cars. My dad was a “car guy” and my older sisters had obviously followed in his tire tracks. Here’s a partial list of vehicles parked in our driveway when I was 7 years old in 1958. A green ’57 Ford Country Squire station wagon complete with acres of plastic wood, a silver 1957 Thunderbird (with the porthole removable hard top), a Jaguar XK 120 Roadster, a British Racing Green 1953 TD MG and a 1940-something Singer roadster.
I fell in love with cars that summer and I’ve never fallen back out.
I remember when my sister Sue was a teenager her first car was a massive burgundy red Buick convertible. I’m not certain of the year, ’54? ’55? But, man that was a car! The grill, a gaping chromium maw, looked as if it could easily swallow a VW or two on the way back from the drive-in. Huge chrome “venti-ports” adorned the front quarter panels and the seats were overstuffed leather lounge chairs. Here’s what I remember most vividly about that Buick. My sister let me sit in the driver’s seat and pretend to drive. As I settled in behind the wheel I noticed that the entire interior was slathered in big chrome badges indicating the great features available to the lucky motorist (That’s me!). The family pizza sized steering wheel itself screamed POWER STEERING in big shiny block letters, a brace of chrome Chiclets on the armrest proudly announced POWER WINDOWS and nestled on the red carpeted floor a few inches beyond the reach of my scrawny little kid legs lay a brick of shiny metal with soft rubber inlays promising a young speed demon the immense security of POWER BRAKES. Who wouldn’t be hooked?
The years flew by and the carousel of great cars continued to turn. By the time I entered adolescence I was reading every car magazine I could get my hands on. I wasn’t picky as long as the topic was cars. I read “Uncle Tom McCahill’s colorful reviews in Popular mechanics, learned about Ed “Big Daddy” Roth’s latest creation in Car Craft and Hot Rod and breathlessly followed a young Richard Petty and his faithful blue #43 Plymouth as he battled Fred Lorenzen’s 427 Ford around Darlington and Daytona Speedways.
So I’m the right guy for a car guy blog, I figure. If you check in regularly I’ll give you my two cents worth on the great and not so great cars of the past, present and future. If you’re wondering about the car in the photo accompanying this blog, that’s the first car I ever owned. Pop bought it for me when I graduated from Boothbay Region High School in 1969. It’s a 1956 Chevy Bel Air “Sport Sedan” which was what they called the 4 door without the B-pillar that year. Equipped with a stock 265 small block and two speed power glide transmission it was no drag strip demon but, WOW, what a fantastic first car. If you want to know the true story behind how it came to be painted like an American flag (and what happened after that) it’s on my 1999 CD, Aint Life Grand available on my website, timsample.com. Meanwhile, thanks a whole lot for stopping by. Leave a comment and check in when you can. This is gonna be fun!

Keep the sticky side down,

Tim Sample

Monday, January 19, 2009

BUY IT ON e-bay?


It was just an experiment. I had no intention of buying. But so many of my friends and relatives had preached the gospel according to e-bay, I thought that I would give it a try. Think of the possibilities: buy a car at a bargain basement price, no hassling with a salesman, just pay your money and leave with the car. Common sense says, “If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.” But common sense rarely plays a role in the passion of an auction.

I had been passing the lot of a local dealer for months, where prominently displayed out front were two beautiful, late model Mustang GTs. Each had low mileage, both were in great shape. As summer lead to fall, then lead to early winter, they still sat there unclaimed. By total coincidence, I came across them both listed for sale on e-bay Motors. For a starting bid of $500, they could be mine (or at least the process could begin). Surely the dealer would be anxious to get them off of the lot before snow. Everything was in my court. Winter was coming, the wounds of high gas prices were still in everyone’s mind, and a new, redesigned Mustang was about to launch. No one would want either one of these cars, and the dealer would want to sell.

I registered on e-bay and began bidding. The adrenalin rush was exciting. Others joined the process. My self-imposed ceiling was $10,000. The bidding continued, but no one met the dealer imposed Reserve Price (the minimum they would accept). As my emotional involvement accelerated, so did that of the other participants. My ceiling came and went, and the bidding continued. I bid more than I wanted to pay. Finally, like a fatigued poker player, I was worn down, and I was out. The other bidders continued, but the cars were not sold, at least on e-bay.

There were no deals to be had, and my money was still safely in my pocket. Even so, I felt empty, with a feeling of failure. I wanted one of the cars, but I didn’t want to pay enough for them. It was an interesting experiment which taught me the value of working with a dealer. For such a substantial purchase as a car, I realized that the dealer’s sales associate does perform a valuable function for the buyer. With an auction, while there are all of the details from the car’s listing information, photos and CarFax reports, there is no sensory gratification; there is no touching, feeling, smelling, and test driving. While I enjoyed the freedom of no pressure from a salesman, there was also a feeling of loneliness and vulnerability. There was no ally representing me in the deal.

I was surprised to learn that I prefer working with a dealer; to work with the resources and talents the dealer can offer. I need the comfort and security of knowing the product by it being visually in front of me, along with meeting and greeting the people that will back the car after the sale. Before bidding in the auction, I had done the same research that I would have done if I was buying the car the traditional dealer way. But there was no feeling of comfort, and no deal to be made. Buy it on e-bay if you want, but it’s not for me.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

THE 2010 MUSTANG IS HERE

Enough with all of the bad news, it’s time to celebrate with some good news. At this writing, the Dow is up more than 900 points in three days, and Ford has launched the next generation of its signature car, the Mustang. Their Web site (http://www.fordvehicles.com/the2010mustang/index.asp) sets the tone with aggressive styling, polished interior details, and it screams of fun.

Mustang has a long history of growing (and surviving) through a variety of incarnations, some good, and some rather bad. Its rejuvenation came with its current design which hit the streets as a 2005. That Mustang’s retro features reflected 1968 when Mustang was at its best, but updated it with current technology. Now the next generation is ready for its launch in the spring of 2009.

Take a look and see what you think. While the 2005 demanded attention, this one continues the legacy in a more polished manner. I have not seen one in person, but the pictures show that the Ford designers were interested in refinement. Exterior edges are now rounded. Curves are everywhere; from the wheel wells, to the hood and grill, to the new tapered tail lights whose turn signals illuminate progressively (remember the Thunderbird of the mid-1960s?). The Mustang still shows aggressive styling, but it feels softer. Ford did not ruin the fine design achievement of the 2005, it just looks different now.

From a first impression, the car appears to be basically the same. Look deeper, and you do find changes. Ford claims that every exterior panel is new, aside from the roof. While the 2010 is now a few pounds heavier on both the GT and V6 models, performance does not suffer as the GT adds 15 hp to 315 hp, and torque increases from 320 lb/ft. to 325 lb/ft. The GT’s power comes from its tried and true 24 valve, SOHC 4.6 liter V8. The V6 continues with its reliable 4 liter at 210 hp.

Beyond its visual stance, this 2010 Mustang improves itself in variety of areas. Ford says that it has reduced squeaks and rattles by 33%, decreased wind noise by 12%, and has decreased the wind drag by 4% for the V6, 7% for the GT. While there are new wheel sizes and tire choices available, the major accomplishment seems to come with the new interior.

The 2005 Mustang looked great from the outside, but the inside was a different story. There were too many glaring surfaces and too much cheap plastic. Ford heard the feedback and has revamped the interior significantly. The interior is now much less harsh, with quality materials and no annoying reflections.

Ford’s redesign of the Mustang comes just in time, as it now faces competition. Amongst much fanfare, the Dodge Challenger is now on the street, and the Chevy Camaro is soon to follow. With refined edges, more horsepower (on the GT), and its much improved interior, Mustang continues to live on as the others just hit the ground. Now, with gas prices plummeting, the muscle car is back, and is hopefully here to stay.

LINKS OF INTEREST:

Stills:
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-mustang-live-unveiling/1168351/

Video:
http://www.fordvehicles.com/the2010mustang/index.asp
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=134729

Friday, November 14, 2008

TO BUY, OR NOT TO BUY


Everyone is waiting desperately for the economy to stabilize, not to mention turn around. No one is more anxious for that good news than the auto manufacturers, and their dealers. While everyone waits, it raises the question, “When is it time to buy a car?”


Buying a car is a major, life event. For a consumer to take the plunge and make such an expensive purchase, needs and/or wants must outweigh the expense. In these shaky economic times, those parameters are hard to satisfy. Eventually, a thaw will occur. The “needs” of the buyer will hit first, and allow them to buy first. These needs may include:

- When a vehicle becomes unsafe, or unreliable due to aging components, or rusting parts.
- When fixing the vehicle is taking more time and energy than the driving.
- When repairs become ridiculously expensive; repeated engine work, chronic electrical problems, transmission work.
- When there is a change of life such as kids being born (or leaving an empty nest), retirement, etc.
- When transportation needs change to provide for construction hauling, commuting, car pooling, etc.
- When the vehicle is just plain cursed. A genuine lemon.
- When it starts making noises you never heard before.
- When the price of gas exceeds $4 per gallon, or plummets below $1 per gallon (dream on).


As the economy recovers and confidence begins to return, the “needs” buyer is followed by the more emotional “wants” buyer. These “wants” may include:

- When love is lost, and the owner is no longer getting back what they are putting into the relationship with the vehicle i.e. too many breakdowns.
- When they have drifted apart, and have nothing more in common.
- When the owner is just plain bored, and is ready for a dramatic change.
- When the seductive commercials convince the buyer that they deserve to be that individual.


Everyone has their own individual needs and wants, all within different time frames. Some people buy cars every three years, some every twenty years. In my case, I have tried to limit such a major purchase until there was a genuine need. My Dodge Colt rusted to the point of no longer being safe (or passing inspection). My Mazda RX7 only had two seats, and was no longer practical with children. The Thunderbird was too hard to pull out car seats, the Taurus wagon was not big enough for hockey bags, and the list will continue.


As for wants, they entice me daily. Every time I see an exotic design drive by, I want to drop my boring discipline, and volunteer to do my part to reinvigorate the economy; to make an impulse purchase. Then I wake up and continue to be boring. People will “need” to replace unsafe or costly vehicles. The emotional passion of “wants” will eventually lead to purchases. The economic thaw will come, hopefully sooner rather than later.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

MERGER: DO, OR DIE?

GM and Chrysler: as one? How could that be? What would it mean?

The initial reports first hit the internet. GM and Chrysler were in exploratory talks. It was down played; explained that companies talk with each other all of the time to explore common goals and interests. But this one has not gone away, and it is actually accelerating.

The automobile sector has always been a cyclical industry. It ebbs and flows with the economic cycles. Manufacturers make billions in the best of times, and save cash to survive the worst of times. This economic barometer has traditionally been read by how many extra shifts are needed to keep up with demand, as opposed to how many auto employees are being laid off.

Domestic auto manufacturers have been hit twice as hard this time around. The inevitable economic downturn came, but they were caught with all of their eggs is one basket. Trucks and large SUVs brought them record profits. Domestics specialized in them. Then, gas prices escalated and they were all caught without a backup plan. Not only were consumers buying fewer vehicles, but they looked to the foreign fuel efficient choices when they bought anything at all.

Daimler was not happy with their purchase of Chrysler and sold the majority of its interest to the investment group, Cerberus, back in early 2007. Perfect timing! Daimler dodged the bullet that has hit all three domestic manufacturers straight in the eye.Ford, GM and Chrysler are all in dire straights. Not only did demand for their product cease, but the credit structure that sustained their livelihood collapsed as well, all part of the housing credit debacle. Now, with survival at stake, all three need money, and they need it now.

Rumors are flying. Ford, on the heels of already selling Aston Martin, Jaguar and Land Rover, is now rumored to be in talks to sell its one third stake of Mazda, either back to Mazda or to a group of Japanese companies. Chrysler’s Jeep brand might be sold to Renault. And now, GM and Chrysler are going to merge? The others make sense, but a GM/Chrysler merger is puzzling. What form would it take? What would it look like? What models would stay, and which would die? Or, would GM just swallow Chrysler and liquidate everything in sight to benefit from its $11.7 billion of cash and sell the remaining hardware?

Many stumbling blocks and questions remain in the way of a GM/Chrysler merger. What role will the unions play in allowing a merger to succeed? Also, Cerberus must buy the remaining 19.9% stake of Chrysler that Daimler still owns, in order to be free to merge. Would the government allow them to merge and own 36% of the US auto market? What would happen to the finance branch, GMAC, a hotly contested issue between GM and Chrysler? Cerberus already owns 50%, GM the other 50%. The investors that are Cerberus wants all of GMAC, and for good reason. When the economy turns around, its massive influence in providing credit is worth millions.

GM now has many interesting choices throughout its product lines (see previous blogs), but within GM, there is already too much redundancy (see my blog, “Power of Twins”). What would be the outcome of diluting the product line further with all of the various Chrysler models? Some would stay, many would not. If the merger became a reality, my crystal ball says: Jeep will remain, GMC will go, Chrysler will become an affordable luxury wing, Dodge will remain with several performance models, Viper will be sold to a customizing manufacturer, Hummer will be bought by an Arab or Russian company, Cadillac will continue to thrive as an icon, Chevrolet and Buick will blend together to become one, eliminating many models. In addition, there will be fewer dealerships, higher prices, many more plant closings, and thousands more jobs lost. GM will again dominate the domestic auto industry, and I will still prefer Ford, or a Japanese brand.


This story seems to change by the hour. Stay tuned to what surely will be a dramatic saga. It is hardly a merger made in heaven, but it appears to be a case of do or die. If the deal does go through, what would the logo look like and how would it fit on the grill of a Solstice?

UPDATE, 11/10/08
The latest rumor is that talks between GM and Cerberus are off, and discussions are proceeding with Hyundai.

UPDATE, 11/11/08
Now GM is out and Cerberus is talking to Hyundai instead. Meanwhile, GM's stock price dropped another 20+%, and a federal bailout is imminent. Stand-by!